Combining Principle And Practice To M.de la Fayette After an acquaintance of nearly fifteen years in difficult situations in America, and various consultations in Europe, I feel a pleasure in presenting to you this small treatise, in gratitude for your services to my beloved America, and as a testimony of my esteem for the virtues, public and private, which I know you to possess.
The only point upon which I could ever discover that we differed was not as to principles of government, but as to time.For my own part I think it equally as injurious to good principles to permit them to linger, as to push them on too fast.That which you suppose accomplishable in fourteen or fifteen years, I may believe practicable in a much shorter period.Mankind, as it appears to me, are always ripe enough to understand their true interest, provided it be presented clearly to their understanding, and that in a manner not to create suspicion by anything like self-design, nor offend by assuming too much.Where we would wish to reform we must not reproach.
When the American revolution was established I felt a disposition to sit serenely down and enjoy the calm.It did not appear to me that any object could afterwards arise great enough to make me quit tranquility and feel as I had felt before.But when principle, and not place, is the energetic cause of action, a man, I find, is everywhere the same.
I am now once more in the public world; and as I have not a right to contemplate on so many years of remaining life as you have, I have resolved to labour as fast as I can; and as I am anxious for your aid and your company, I wish you to hasten your principles and overtake me.
If you make a campaign the ensuing spring, which it is most probable there will be no occasion for, I will come and join you.
Should the campaign commence, I hope it will terminate in the extinction of German despotism, and in establishing the ******* of all Germany.When France shall be surrounded with revolutions she will be in peace and safety, and her taxes, as well as those of Germany, will consequently become less.
Your sincere, Affectionate Friend, THOMAS PAINELONDON, Feb.9, 1792
Preface When I began the chapter entitled the "Conclusion" in the former part of the Rights Of Man, published last year, it was my intention to have extended it to a greater length; but in casting the whole matter in my mind, which I wish to add, I found that it must either make the work too bulky, or contract my plan too much.
I therefore brought it to a close as soon as the subject would admit, and reserved what I had further to say to another opportunity.
Several other reasons contributed to produce this determination.I wished to know the manner in which a work, written in a style of thinking and expression different to what had been customary in England, would be received before I proceeded farther.A great field was opening to the view of mankind by means of the French Revolution.Mr.Burke's outrageous opposition thereto brought the controversy into England.He attacked principles which he knew (from information) I would contest with him, because they are principles I believe to be good, and which I have contributed to establish, and conceive myself bound to defend.Had he not urged the controversy, I had most probably been a silent man.
Another reason for deferring the remainder of the work was, that Mr.
Burke promised in his first publication to renew the subject at another opportunity, and to make a comparison of what he called the English and French Constitutions.I therefore held myself in reserve for him.He has published two works since, without doing this: which he certainly would not have omitted, had the comparison been in his favour.
In his last work, his "Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs," he has quoted about ten pages from the Rights Of Man, and having given himself the trouble of doing this, says he "shall not attempt in the smallest degree to refute them," meaning the principles therein contained.I am enough acquainted with Mr.Burke to know that he would if he could.But instead of contesting them, he immediately after consoles himself with saying that "he has done his part."- He has not done his part.He has not performed his promise of a comparison of constitutions.He started the controversy, he gave the challenge, and has fled from it; and he is now a case in point with his own opinion that "the age of chivalry is gone!"The title, as well as the substance of his last work, his "Appeal,"is his condemnation.Principles must stand on their own merits, and if they are good they certainly will.To put them under the shelter of other men's authority, as Mr.Burke has done, serves to bring them into suspicion.Mr.Burke is not very fond of dividing his honours, but in this case he is artfully dividing the disgrace.
But who are those to whom Mr.Burke has made his appeal? A set of childish thinkers, and half-way politicians born in the last century, men who went no farther with any principle than as it suited their purposes as a party; the nation was always left out of the question; and this has been the character of every party from that day to this.The nation sees nothing of such works, or such politics, worthy its attention.A little matter will move a party, but it must be something great that moves a nation.
