It was the same with our fathers in the time of the Great Civil War.We are by no means unmindful of the great debt which mankind owes to the Puritans of that time, the deliverers of England, the founders of the American Commonwealths.But in the day of their power, those men committed one great fault, which left deep and lasting traces in the national character and manners.They mistook the end and overrated the force of government.They determined, not merely to protect religion and public morals from insult, an object for which the civil sword, in discreet hands, may be beneficially employed, but to make the people committed to their rule truly devout.Yet, if they had only reflected on events which they had themselves witnessed and in which they had themselves borne a great part, they would have seen what was likely to be the result of their enterprise.They had lived under a government which, during a long course of years, did all that could be done, by lavish bounty and by rigorous punishment, to enforce conformity to the doctrine and discipline of the Church of England.No person suspected of hostility to that Church had the smallest chance of obtaining favour at the Court of Charles.
Avowed dissent was punished by imprisonment, by ignominious exposure, by cruel mutilations, and by ruinous fines.And the event had been that the Church had fallen, and had, in its fall, dragged down with it a monarchy which had stood six hundred years.The Puritan might have learned, if from nothing else, yet from his own recent victory, that governments which attempt things beyond their reach are likely not merely to fail, but to produce an effect directly the opposite of that which they contemplate as desirable.
All this was overlooked.The saints were to inherit the earth.
The theatres were closed.The fine arts were placed under absurd restraints.Vices which had never before been even misdemeanours were made capital felonies.It was solemnly resolved by Parliament "that no person shall be employed but such as the House shall be satisfied of his real godliness." The pious assembly had a Bible lying on the table for reference.If they had consulted it they might have learned that the wheat and the tares grow together inseparably, and must either be spared together or rooted up together.To know whether a man was really godly was impossible.But it was easy to know whether he had a plain dress, lank hair, no starch in his linen, no gay furniture in his house; whether he talked through his nose, and showed the whites of his eyes; whether he named his children Assurance, Tribulation, Mahershalal-hash-baz; whether he avoided Spring Garden when in town, and abstained from hunting and hawking when in the country; whether he expounded hard scriptures to his troop of dragoons, and talked in a committee of ways and means about seeking the Lord.These were tests which could easily be applied.
The misfortune was that they were tests which proved nothing.
Such as they were, they were employed by the dominant party.And the consequence was that a crowd of impostors, in every walk of life, began to mimic and to caricature what were then regarded as the outward signs of sanctity.The nation was not duped.The restraints of that gloomy time were such as would have been impatiently borne, if imposed by men who were universally believed to be saints.Those restraints became altogether insupportable when they were known to be kept up for the profit of hypocrites.It is quite certain that, even if the royal family had never returned, even if Richard Cromwell or Henry Cromwell had been at the head of the administration, there would have been a great relaxation of manners.Before the Restoration many signs indicated that a period of licence was at hand.The Restoration crushed for a time the Puritan party, and placed supreme power in the hands of a libertine.The political counter-revolution assisted the moral counter-revolution, and was in turn assisted by it.A period of wild and desperate dissoluteness followed.
Even in remote manor-houses and hamlets the change was in some degree felt; but in London the outbreak of debauchery was appalling; and in London the places most deeply infected were the Palace, the quarters inhabited by the aristocracy, and the Inns of Court.It was on the support of these parts of the town that the playhouses depended.The character of the drama became conformed to the character of its patrons.The comic poet was the mouthpiece of the most deeply corrupted part of a corrupted society.And in the plays before us we find, distilled and condensed, the essential spirit of the fashionable world during the anti-Puritan reaction.
The Puritan had affected formality; the comic poet laughed at decorum.The Puritan had frowned at innocent diversions; the comic poet took under his patronage the most flagitious excesses.
The Puritan had canted; the comic poet blasphemed.The Puritan had made an affair of gallantry felony without benefit of clergy;the comic poet represented it as an honourable distinction.The Puritan spoke with disdain of the low standard of popular morality; his life was regulated by a far more rigid code; his virtue was sustained by motives unknown to men of the world.
Unhappily it had been amply proved in many cases, and might well be suspected in many more, that these high pretensions were unfounded.Accordingly, the fashionable circles, and the comic poets who were the spokesmen of those circles, took up the notion that all professions of piety and integrity were to be construed by the rule of contrary; that it might well be doubted whether there was such a thing as virtue in the world; but that, at all events, a person who affected to be better than his neighbours was sure to be a knave.
