(October 1840)
The Ecclesiastical and political History of the Popes of Rome, during the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.By LEOPOLD RANKE, Professor in the University of Berlin: Translated from the German, by SARAH AUSTIN.3 vols.8vo.London: 1840.
It is hardly necessary for us to say that this is an excellent book excellently translated.The original work of Professor Ranke is known and esteemed wherever German literature is studied, and has been found interesting even in a most inaccurate and dishonest French version.It is, indeed, the work of a mind fitted both for minute researches and for large speculations.It is written also in an admirable spirit, equally remote from levity and bigotry, serious and earnest, yet tolerant and impartial.It is, therefore, with the greatest pleasure that we now see this book take its place among the English classics.Of the translation we need only say that it is such as might be expected from the skill, the taste, and the scrupulous integrity of the accomplished lady who, as an interpreter between the mind of Germany and the mind of Britain, has already deserved so well of both countries.
The subject of this book has always appeared to us singularly interesting.How it was that Protestantism did so much, yet did no more, how it was that the Church of Rome, having lost a large part of Europe, not only ceased to lose, but actually regained nearly half of what she had lost, is certainly a most curious and important question; and on this question Professor Ranke has thrown far more light than any other person who has written on it.
There is not, and there never was on this earth, a work of human policy so well deserving of examination as the Roman Catholic Church.The history of that Church joins together the two great ages of human civilisation.No other institution is left standing which carries the mind back to the times when the smoke of sacrifice rose from the Pantheon, and when camelopards and tigers bounded in the Flavian amphitheatre.The proudest royal houses are but of yesterday, when compared with the line of the Supreme Pontiffs.That line we trace back in an unbroken series, from the Pope who crowned Napoleon in the nineteenth century to the Pope who crowned Pepin in the eighth; and far beyond the time of Pepin the august dynasty extends, till it is lost in the twilight of fable.The republic of Venice came next in antiquity.But the republic of Venice was modern when compared with the Papacy; and the republic of Venice is gone, and the Papacy remains.The Papacy remains, not in decay, not a mere antique, but full of life and youthful vigour.The Catholic Church is still sending forth to the farthest ends of the world missionaries as zealous as those who landed in Kent with Augustin, and still confronting hostile kings with the same spirit with which she confronted Attila.The number of her children is greater than in any former age.Her acquisitions in the New World have more than compensated for what she has lost in the Old.Her spiritual ascendency extends over the vast countries which lie between the plains of the Missouri and Cape Horn, countries which a century hence, may not improbably contain a population as large as that which now inhabits Europe.The members of her communion are certainly not fewer than a hundred and fifty millions; and it will be difficult to show that all other Christian sects united amount to a hundred and twenty millions.Nor do we see any sign which indicates that the term of her long dominion is approaching.She saw the commencement of all the governments and of all the ecclesiastical establishments that now exist in the world; and we feel no assurance that she is not destined to see the end of them all.
She was great and respected before the Saxon had set foot on Britain, before the Frank had passed the Rhine, when Grecian eloquence still flourished at Antioch, when idols were still worshipped in the temple of Mecca.And she may still exist in undiminished vigour when some traveller from New Zealand shall, in the midst of a vast solitude, take his stand on a broken arch of London Bridge to sketch the ruins of St.Paul's.
We often hear it said that the world is constantly becoming more and more enlightened, and that this enlightening must be favourable to Protestantism, and unfavourable to Catholicism.We wish that we could think so.But we see great reason to doubt whether this be a well-founded expectation.We see that during the last two hundred and fifty years the human mind has been in the highest degree active, that it has made great advances in every branch of natural philosophy, that it has produced innumerable inventions tending to promote the convenience of life, that medicine, surgery, chemistry, engineering, have been very greatly improved, that government, police, and law have been improved, though not to so great an extent as the physical sciences.Yet we see that, during these two hundred and fifty years, Protestantism has made no conquests worth speaking of.
Nay, we believe that, as far as there has been a change, that change has, on the whole, been in favour of the Church of Rome.
We cannot, therefore, feel confident that the progress of knowledge will necessarily be fatal to a system which has, to say the least, stood its ground in spite of the immense progress made by the human race in knowledge since the days of Queen Elizabeth.
