The mere choice and arrangement of his words would have sufficed to make his essays classical.For never, not even by Dryden, not even by Temple, had the English language been written with such sweetness, grace, and facility.But this was the smallest part of Addison's praise.Had he clothed his thoughts in the half French style of Horace Walpole, or in the half Latin style of Dr.
Johnson, or in the half German jargon of the present day, his genius would have triumphed over all faults of manner.As a moral satirist he stands unrivalled.If ever the best Tatlers and Spectators were equalled in their own kind, we should be inclined to guess that it must have been by the lost comedies of Menander.
In wit properly so called, Addison was not inferior to Cowley or Butler.No single ode of Cowley contains so many happy analogies as are crowded into the lines to Sir Godfrey Kneller; and we would undertake to collect from the Spectators as great a number of ingenious illustrations as can be found in Hudibras.The still higher faculty of invention Addison possessed in still larger measure.The numerous fictions, generally original, often wild and grotesque, but always singularly graceful and happy, which are found in his essays, fully entitle him to the rank of a great poet, a rank to which his metrical compositions give him no claim.As an observer of life, of manners, of all the shades of human character, he stands in the first class.
And what he observed he had the art of communicating in two widely different ways.He could describe virtues, vices, habits, whims, as well as Clarendon.But he could do something better.
He could call human beings into existence, and make them exhibit themselves.If we wish to find anything more vivid than Addison's best portraits, we must go either to Shakspeare or to Cervantes.
But what shall we say of Addison's humour, of his sense of the ludicrous, of his power of awakening that sense in others, and of drawing mirth from incidents which occur every day, and from little peculiarities of temper and manner, such as may be found in every man? We feel the charm: we give ourselves up to it; but we strive in vain to analyse it.
Perhaps the best way of describing Addison's peculiar pleasantry is to compare it with the pleasantry of some other great satirists.The three most eminent masters of the art of ridicule, during the eighteenth century, were, we conceive, Addison, Swift, and Voltaire.Which of the three had the greatest power of moving laughter may be questioned.But each of them, within his own domain, was supreme.
Voltaire is the prince of buffoons.His merriment is without disguise or restraint.He gambols; he grins; he shakes his sides;he points the finger; he turns up the nose; he shoots out the tongue.The manner of Swift is the very opposite to this.He moves laughter, but never joins in it.He appears in his works such as he appeared in society.All the company are convulsed with merriment, while the Dean, the author of all the mirth, preserves an invincible gravity, and even sourness of aspect, and gives utterance to the most eccentric and ludicrous fancies, with the air of a man reading the commination service.
The manner of Addison is as remote from that of Swift as from that of Voltaire.He neither laughs out like the French wit, nor, like the Irish wit, throws a double portion of severity into his countenance while laughing inwardly; but preserves a look peculiarly his own, a look of demure serenity, disturbed only by an arch sparkle of the eye, an almost imperceptible elevation of the brow, an almost imperceptible curl of the lip.His tone is never that either of a Jack Pudding or of a Cynic.It is that of a gentleman, in whom the quickest sense of the ridiculous is constantly tempered by good nature and good breeding.
We own that the humour of Addison is, in our opinion, of a more delicious flavour than the humour of either Swift or Voltaire.
Thus much, at least, is certain, that both Swift and Voltaire have been successfully mimicked, and that no man has yet been able to mimic Addison.The letter of the Abbe Coyer to Pansophe is Voltaire all over, and imposed, during a long time, on the Academicians of Paris.There are passages in Arbuthnot's satirical works which we, at least, cannot distinguish from Swift's best writing.But of the many eminent men who have made Addison their model, though several have copied his mere diction with happy effect, none has been able to catch the tone of his pleasantry.In the World, in the Connoisseur, in the Mirror, in the Lounger, there are numerous Papers written in obvious imitation of his Tatlers and Spectators.Most of those papers have some merit; many are very lively and amusing; but there is not a single one which could be passed off as Addison's on a critic of the smallest perspicacity.
But that which chiefly distinguishes Addison from Swift, from Voltaire, from almost all the other great masters of ridicule, is the grace, the nobleness, the moral purity, which we find even in his merriment.Severity, gradually hardening and darkening into misanthropy, characterises the works of Swift.The nature of Voltaire was, indeed, not inhuman; but he venerated nothing.
Neither in the masterpieces of art nor in the purest examples of virtue, neither in the Great First Cause nor in the awful enigma of the grave, could he see anything but subjects for drollery.
