The more solemn and august the theme, the more monkey-like was his grimacing and chattering.The mirth of Swift is the mirth of Mephistopheles; the mirth of Voltaire is the mirth of Puck.If, as, Soame Jenyns oddly imagined, a portion of the happiness of Seraphim and just men made perfect be derived from an exquisite perception of the ludicrous, their mirth must surely be none other than the mirth of Addison; a mirth consistent with tender compassion for all that is frail, and with profound reverence for all that is sublime.Nothing great, nothing amiable, no moral duty, no doctrine of natural or revealed religion, has ever been associated by Addison with any degrading idea.His humanity is without a parallel in literary history.The highest proof of virtue is to possess boundless power without abusing it.No kind of power is more formidable than the power of ****** men ridiculous; and that power Addison possessed in boundless measure.How grossly that power was abused by Swift and by Voltaire is well known.But of Addison it may be confidently affirmed that he has blackened no man's character, nay, that it would be difficult if not impossible, to find in all the volumes which he has left us a single taunt which can be called ungenerous or unkind.Yet he had detractors, whose malignity might have seemed to justify as terrible a revenge as that which men, not superior to him in genius, wreaked on Bettesworth and on Franc de Pompignan.He was a politician; he was the best writer of his party; he lived in times of fierce excitement, in times when persons of high character and station stooped to scurrility such as is now practised only by the basest of mankind.Yet no provocation and no example could induce him to return railing for railing.
On the service which his Essays rendered to morality it is difficult to speak too highly.It is true that, when the Tatler appeared, that age of outrageous profaneness and licentiousness which followed the Restoration had passed away.Jeremy Collier had shamed the theatres into something which, compared with the excesses of Etherege and Wycherley, might be called decency.Yet there still lingered in the public mind a pernicious notion that there was some connection between genius and profligacy, between the domestic virtues and the sullen formality of the Puritans.
That error it is the glory of Addison to have dispelled.He taught the nation that the faith and the morality of Hale and Tillotson might be found in company with wit more sparkling than the wit of Congreve, and with humour richer than the humour of Vanbrugh.So effectually indeed, did he retort on vice the mockery which had recently been directed against virtue, that, since his time, the open violation of decency has always been considered among us as the mark of a fool.And this revolution, the greatest and most salutary ever effected by any satirist, he accomplished, be it remembered, without writing one personal lampoon.
In the earlier contributions of Addison to the Tatler his peculiar powers were not fully exhibited.Yet from the first, his superiority to all his coadjutors was evident.Some of his later Tatlers are fully equal to anything that he ever wrote.Among the portraits we most admire "Tom Folio," "Ned Softly," and the "Political Upholsterer." "The Proceedings of the Court of Honour," the "Thermometer of Zeal," the story of the "Frozen Words," the "Memoirs of the Shilling," are excellent specimens of that ingenious and lively species of fiction in which Addison excelled all men.There is one still better paper of the same class.But though that paper, a hundred and thirty-three years ago, was probably thought as edifying as one of Smalridge's sermons, we dare not indicate it to the squeamish readers of the nineteenth century.
During the session of Parliament which commenced in November 1709, and which the impeachment of Sacheverell has made memorable, Addison appears to have resided in London, The Tatler was now more popular than any periodical paper had ever been; and his connection with it was generally known.It was not known, however, that almost everything good in the Tatler was his.The truth is, that the fifty or sixty numbers which we owe to him were not merely the best, but so decidedly the best that any five of them are more valuable than all the two hundred numbers in which he had no share.
He required, at this time, all the solace which he could derive from literary success.The Queen had always disliked the Whigs.
